Landlord’s objective:
- to make sure that the Property is maintained to an acceptable
standard, at the tenant’s expense, so it can be re-let without
significant work or expenditure by the landlord.
Tenant’s objective:
- to limit liability to repair to what is reasonable given the age
and condition of the Property and the length of the lease; and
- to avoid liability for carrying out work that arises because of a
defect in the Property or which is covered by the landlord’s
insurance.
Basic repairing covenant
The normal position in a commercial lease is for the tenant to be
responsible for repairing the parts of the property let to it, except
where damage is caused by an insured risk (see Insurance for more
detail on this and the position in relation to uninsured loss). The
definition of the Property will govern exactly what the tenant is
obliged to repair, so it is vital that this is clear, especially where the
lease relates to part of a larger building. The landlord’s repairing
obligation should cover the parts not let to the tenant. If the lease is
badly drafted and there are parts of the building that neither party is
obliged to repair, the court will be reluctant to fill the gap by implying the missing obligations (Jacey Property Co Ltd v de Sousa [2003]
EWCA Civ 510)

Repair generally means restoring the Property by renewing or
replacing subsidiary parts of it (Lurcott v Wakely [1911] 1 K.B. 905).
Work that would involve renewing the whole of the Property or giving
back to the landlord something wholly different from the Property
originally let will generally not fall within a repairing obligation,
although this can be a question of degree (see Inherent defects).

A typical repairing covenant will read:
“To keep the Property in good and substantial repair”. Words like
“good and substantial” or “good and tenantable” do not add
anything to the basic obligation to repair (Proudfoot v Hart (1890) 25
Q.B.D. 42). The tenant must keep the Property in the state of repair
that a reasonably minded tenant likely to take a lease of the Property
would expect. The required standard of repair will be judged by
reference to the age, character and nature of the Property at the
date of the lease.

Good condition
It is increasingly common to see a covenant that reads:
“To keep the Property in good and substantial repair and condition”.
The reference to condition adds to the basic repairing obligation and
may mean the tenant has to carry out works that go beyond mere
repair. For example, a property suffering from damp and condensation
because of poor ventilation would not comply with a covenant to keep
it in “good condition and repair” and the tenant might be obliged to
improve the ventilation. This would not be the case without the
reference to “condition” (Welsh v Greenwich London Borough Council
[2000] 3 EGLR 41).
Inherent defects
The Property may suffer from defects caused by faulty design or
construction (often referred to as inherent defects). If the lease does
not set out expressly who is liable to remedy inherent defects, the
general rule is that the tenant will not be obliged to deal with them
unless they have caused disrepair. In practice, this means that the
Property must be in a worse condition than it previously was (Quick
v Taff-Ely Borough Council [1985] 3 All ER 321). If the Property is
defective (for example, the basement floods regularly) but has not
suffered any actual deterioration, the repairing obligation will not
bite (Post Office v Aquarius [1987] 1 All ER 1055).
If a defect has caused disrepair, the tenant’s repairing obligation may
extend to remedying the defect as well, depending on the extent of
the work that would be required (Ravenseft Properties Ltd v
Davstone (Holdings) Ltd [1979] 1 All ER 929; Stent v Monmouth D.C.
[1987] 1 EGLR 59).

Schedules of condition
If the tenant’s repairing obligation is to be limited to keeping the
Property in no worse a state than it is at the date of the lease, it is
vital to include a comprehensive schedule of condition in the lease.
This should be prepared by a surveyor and agreed by the parties. It
must describe in detail the precise condition of the Property at the
date of the lease and should include photographs.
|