• Wickens v Cheval Property Developments Ltd [2010] EWHC 2249 (Ch) (08 September 2010)
• Eminence Property Developments Ltd. v Heaney [2010] EWCA Civ 1168 (21 October 2010)
• Loyaltrend & anor v Creechurch Dedicated Ltd & ors [2010] EWHC 425
• Agricullo v Yorkshire Housing [2010] EWCA Civ 229
• Joyce v Bowman Law Ltd [2010] EWHC 251(TCC)
• Gold Group Properties Ltd v BDW Trading Ltd [2010] EWHC 323 (TCC)
• Ng & anor v Ashley King (Developments) Ltd [2010] EWHC 456 (Ch)
• Davies & Ors v Jones & anr [2009] EWCA Civ 1164
• Pascal v Puppet [2009] EWHC 2771
• Seymour Road v Williams & Ors [2010] EWHC 111
• Davies v Dennis & Ors [2009] EWCA Civ 1081
• Clarence House v NatWest Bank [2009] EWCA Civ 1311
• Mihovilovic v Leicester [2010] UKUT 22(LC)
• Van Dal Footwear v Ryman [2009] EWCA Civ 1478
• Patel v Keles [2009]EWCA Civ 1187
• Fidler v Secretary of State [2010] EWHC 143
• Stoll v Wacks Caller (2009)EWCA
• Daejan Investments v Benson [2009] UKUT (LC)
• Heslop v Bishton(2009)EWCA 607
• Orchad v Reuters [2009] EWCA Civ6
• Imageview v Jack [2009] EWCA Civ 63
• North Eastern Properties v Coleman [2009] EWHC 2174 (Ch)

• Greatorex v Newman [2008] EWCA Civ 1318
• Davill v Pull [2009] EWCA Civ 1309
• Thompson v Bee [2009] EWCA Civ 1212
• Hosebay Ltd v Day [2009] PLSCS 318
• Goldacre v Nortel [2009] EWHC 3389 (Ch)
• Barratt Homes v Welsh Water [2009] UKSC 13
• Clarence House v NatWest [2009] EWHC 77 (Ch)
• Clarence House v NatWest Bank [2009] EWCA Civ 1311
• Shaw v Doleman [2009] EWCA Civ 279

• Watson v Croft [2009] EWCA Civ 15
• Langley v Coal Authority [2003] EWCA Civ 204
• Dennis v Davies [2008] EWHC 2961 (Ch)
• Marine Drive, Brighton [2009] EWLands LP/14/2007
• Ansari v New India [2009] EWCA Civ 93
• R (on application of Smith) v Land Registry [2009] EWHC 328 (Admin)
• Waterman v Boyle [2009] EWCA Civ 115
• Heronslea v Kwik-Fit [2009] EWHC 295 (QB)
• Morshead Mansions v Di Marco [2008] EWCA Civ 1371
• Palm Developments v Secretary of State [2009] EWHC 220 (Admin)
• Alchemy Estates v Astor [2008]
• Angel Solicitors v Jenkins O’Dowd & Barth [2009]
• Salvage Wharf Ltd v G&S Brough [2009]
• Innovate v Sunberry [2008]
• Clarence House v NatWest [2009]
• Boots v Trafford Centre [2008]
• Knowsley Housing Trust v White and Honeygan-Green [2008]
• Auger v Camden [2008]
• Yeoman’s Row v Cobbe [2008]
• Osibanjo v Seahive [2008]
• Chinnock v Hocaoglu [2008]
• Andrew Finn-Kelcey v Milton Keynes [2008]
• Scottish & Newcastle v Raguz [2008]
• Yorkshire Bank v Mulhall [2008]
• Thomas v Ken Thomas [2006]
• Risegold v Escala [2008]
• Midill v Park Lane Estates [2008]
• Jackson v Watson [2008]
• Lee v Birmingham [2008]
• Horsham Properties v Clark [2008]
• Lawntown v Camenzuli [2007]
• Landlord Protect v St Anselm [2008]
• Lawntown v Camenzuli [2007]
• Field Common v Elmbridge BC [2008]
• Chilli v English Partnerships [2008]
• McGuane v Welch [2008]
• Young v Brooks [2008]
• Lewis v Persimmon Homes [2008]
• Lewisham v Malcolm [2008]
• Peabody Trust v Michael Reeve [2008]
• McCann v UK [2008]
• Auger v LB of Camden[2008]
• Crowe v Massey [2008]
• Floyd v S [2008]
• Wragg & ors v Surrey CC [2008]
• Regus v Epcot [2008]
• Foxtons v Pelkey [2008]
• County Homesearch v Cowham [2008]
• Oun v Ahmad [2008]
• RHJ Ltd v FT Patten [2008]
• Shah v Colvia [2008]
• Dartmouth Court v Berisworth [2008]