|
An excellent note from the Zurich makes the point that a solicitor who gives
a financial undertaking is effectively pledging the firm’s credit and acting as
guarantor for the client.
The classic example of carelessness when giving an undertaking is on
completion of a conveyance when the seller’s solicitor tells the buyer’s solicitor
that the ‘usual undertakings’ will be given on completion, with the seller’s
solicitor having overlooked the existence of a second charge. Needless to say,
in that situation the solicitor is fully liable (and can only hope that he will be
able to recover the funds from the seller).
Rule 24 of the Code of Conduct makes it clear that an ‘undertaking can be
given orally or in writing, and need not include the words ‘undertake’ or
‘undertaking’. For example:
- contracts were exchanged on the sale of a property, but the deposit
was to be paid a week later. The buyer’s solicitor therefore wrote saying
‘the deposit will follow by Monday 30 April’. However, the buyer was
unable to fund the deposit which led to the developer rescinding the
contract and complaining to the SRA. The solicitors argued that there
had been no undertaking and that they were merely confirming their
client’s instructions. The SRA disagreed and the solicitors (ie their
insurers) had to pay the £54,000 deposit (by which time their client
had disappeared to Thailand).
Likewise, take great care when giving an undertaking on your ‘client’s behalf’.
For instance:
- in a matrimonial dispute, H was worried that W would take money
out of a particular bank account. On W’s instructions, her solicitor
wrote to H’s solicitor saying ‘our client has authorised us to give an
undertaking on her behalf that she will not make any withdrawals
from the account pending the determination of your client’s
application... unless made with your client’s written consent’. W
promptly withdrew £30,000, and H’s solicitors complained to the SRA
that there had been a breach of undertaking. Not surprisingly, the
solicitor argued that he had not given an undertaking for himself, but
had merely given one on the client’s behalf. The SRA disagreed, saying
what the solicitor should have done was to specifically disclaim any
personal responsibility and make it clear that he was simply informing
H’s solicitors of W’s intentions.
Never give an undertaking over which you do not have full control. For
instance:
- the solicitor acting for a buyer of property wrote to the private lender
who was funding the purchase saying ‘I am writing to confirm that
the property... will not be sold or leased by Mr X without your written
permission until the loan you made to him is repaid’. However, the
client sold the property (using another solicitor) and the lender relied
on the undertaking to claim £350,000 from the solicitors.
Do take great care with undertakings. In particular, if you are giving the
undertaking on behalf of the client or if it relates to events over which you
have no control, then specifically state that you are not assuming any personal
liability and that you are merely passing on your client’s stated intentions.
Source: Zurich@risk September 2008 .© Practical Lawyer
|
|
October 2008 |