|
REITs – acting for a buyer |
|
|
As REITs become more commonplace, practitioners need to give thought
to the implications of acting for a buyer of a property-rich company from
an existing REIT. At the moment, with only a small number of listed
companies being converted to REITs, it should be straightforward to
identify a REIT vendor.
But, as time passes and the number of REITs
increases, this may require specific confirmation in the due diligence
process. Moreover, if a seller is within the REIT regime, then the
potential purchaser should raise additional inquiries, including whether
the property-rich company is wholly within the tax-exempt regime or
whether all, or part, of its business falls outside the tax-exempt regime
(and so is treated as a business taxable in the normal manner).
One major advantage of bringing a company within the REIT regime is
that the chargeable gain base cost of properties held within the taxexempt
business at the time of entry is increased to the market value of
the property at that time. This will be particularly attractive for a company
with a low cost base on a property and hence an inherent chargeable gain without the benefits of the REIT regime. But, there are three points to watch out for:
- how was the entry fee paid? There is currently an entry charge of just
2% of market value (divided by the applicable tax rate for the
company). Each company in a group REIT is responsible for paying its
own entry fee. A purchaser should therefore quantify how the market
value (and thus the entry fee) was calculated; whether the entry fee (or
part) is still outstanding (and, if so, how this will be dealt with when
agreeing the price for the property). Specific warranties should be
sought. If the entry fee is payable in instalments, then do not forget
that the total amount due is greater than if the one-off fee were paid
(and do not forget if a company ceases to be within the REIT regime
then early payment of remaining instalments may come into effect);
- the limitations of base cost uplift. Although the base cost uplift is not
affected by a company leaving the REIT (eg on the sale to a non-REIT
entity), the uplift is cancelled if the property is sold out of the company
within two years of the company leaving the REIT regime (assuming the
company was in the REIT regime for less than ten years). This is an
important point, especially if the company holds a portfolio of
properties, some of which the buyer plans to sell within two years of
acquiring the company. If that happens, the company could become
liable for a much larger tax bill than was anticipated when the entity
was purchased. It follows then that further information on the tax
affairs of the company pre-entry into the REIT regime should be
reviewed to enable a full assessment to be made;
- have REIT conditions been complied with by the group company?
Selling a company out of a group REIT is one potential way to trigger
that company leaving the REIT regime. However, failure by the group
REIT as a whole to comply with the necessary conditions can, in
extreme situations, lead to the REIT regime ceasing to apply to the
group as a whole. If a major breach (or a series of minor breaches)
occurred in the year in which the group initially entered the regime, this
could effectively mean that the group had never actually been within
the REIT regime at all. Accordingly, there would never have been an
uplift in base cost of the properties. This is probably an unlikely
situation, but it is one that should usually be addressed by specific
indemnities from the seller company group.
This is a complex area. The point of this note is to emphasise that those
who are buying property-rich companies from REITs should be aware that
there are detailed tax issues that have to be considered, and pitfalls to
be avoided. For an excellent introductory article see [2007] 191 Property
Law Journal 11. © Practical Lawyer
|
|
July 2007 |