|
Listed building – reminder |
|
It is worth noting that the government has issued new guidance to LAs aimed
at more enforcement of the listed buildings regime. Bear in mind that:
-
there is no limitation period for breaches;
- liability runs ‘with the land’ (ie an innocent purchaser will have to remedy
the defects);
- if the LA serves a notice or letter of intent, the owner should consider
applying for retrospective listed building consent. No enforcement action
will be taken until the outcome of that application is known;
- bear in mind that properties in conservation areas are also subject to
restrictions (in particular, demolition);
- many people falsely believe that listing is limited to certain aspects of the
building only and that it also depends on the grading of the listing. In
particular, there is absolutely no substance in the common
misconception that a Grade II listing refers to the exterior only, nor that
the features specifically mentioned in the listing notice are the only items
requiring preservation. Everything in all buildings of all grades is
protected, unless it can be shown that the feature or element is of no
significance and does not contribute to the special interest of the
building. This applies not just to the buildings or structures attached to
the main listed building, but also to independent structures within the
curtilage (if erected prior to 1948);
- when acting for a purchaser of a listed building you will need to look
through the planning file for all listed building consents that have been
granted (and all applications that have been refused). In particular you
need to know what conditions have been imposed, and you will want
confirmation from the seller that he carried out no unauthorised works
(and preferably, confirmation that no unauthorised works were carried out
by his predecessors in title).
Ideally, the client should instruct a surveyor who is qualified in historic
buildings conservation to advise (ie look at the building, consult the planning
file, check that all conditions had been met, and look for suspicious features
that might possibly be unauthorised alterations). Needless to say, many
clients will not be prepared to pay for such specialist advice, but if you have
warned of the need to get such advice then you will have probably protected
your own insurance policy! For an introductory article see [2006] SJ 938.
|
|
October 2006 |